Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery ; (12): 10-14, 2021.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-930890

ABSTRACT

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with bile duct tumor thrombus (BDTT) is rare and enhanced CT or MRI can be used for its diagnosis. Surgical procedure is the main treatment for HCC with BDTT. The authors introduce the experiences of recurrent patient with HCC and BDTT who was treated with targeted therapy plus immunotherapy, in order to provide reference for its clinical diagnosis and treatment.

2.
Chinese Journal of General Surgery ; (12): 393-396, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-755831

ABSTRACT

Objective To explore the diagnosis and treatment of Castleman's disease (CD) of the abdomen and pelvis.Methods The clinical data of 51 cases of abdomen and pelvis CD were analyzed retrospectively from Jan 2007 to Oct 2017 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University.Patients were divided into two groups according to the different clinical classifications:Localized CD (n =42) and Multicentric CD (n =9).Results 32 cases of LCD were asymptomatic (76%),others accompanied by abdominal or waist pain,abdominal distention.The main pathological type was hyaline vascular (93%),which can be cured by surgical treatment (41/42).MCD always accompanied by multiple superficial and deep lymph node enlargement in the whole body.Most of them suffered from anemia,fever,weight loss and dyspnea.CRP increased,hypoproteinemia,globulin increased,neutropenia were found.The main pathological type was plasma cell type (56%).There were no progress in 3 cases,and 6 cases were on remission after operation.Conclusion The diagnosis of abdomen and pelvis CD depends on pathological examination.LCD clinical symptoms are mild and good prognosis after surgery.However,MCD clinical manifestations are complex,and relatively poor prognosis after comprehensive treatment.

3.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery ; (12): 165-168, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-733570

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the application value of choledochoscopy and imaging examination in the diagnosis and treatment of residual bile duct stones.Methods The retrospective descriptive study was conducted.The clinical data of 618 patients who underwent choledochoscopy and imaging examination after operation of hepatolithiasis in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between April 2014 and September 2018 were collected,including 300 males and 318 females,aged from 19 to 89 years,with an average age of (58 ± 12)years.Observation indicators:(1) situations of residual bile duct stones diagnosed by choledochoscopy and imaging examination;(2) stone extraction situations of patients with hepatolithiasis.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD,and measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range).Count data were represented as absolute number or percentage,and analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact propability.Results (1) Situations of residual bile duct stones diagnosed by choledochoscopy and imaging examination:all the 618 patients underwent choledochoscopy,and 505 of them underwent the imaging examination before choledochoscopy.① Of patients undergoing single imaging examination,72 received ultrasonography,with false-negative rate of 29.17% (21/72);37 received CT examination,with false-negative rate of 10.81%(4/37);33 received T-tube cholangiography,with false-negative rate of 39.39% (13/33).② Of patients undergoing combined two imaging examinations,61 received ultrasonography + CT,with false-negative rate of 8.20% (5/61);129 received ultrasonography + T-tube cholangiography,with false-negative rate of 12.40% (16/129);52 received CT + T-tube cholangiography,with false-negative rate of 5.77%(3/52).③ There were 121 receiving ultrasound+CT+T-tube cholangiography,with false-negative rate of 7.44% (9/121).There were statistically significant differences in the false-negative rates of combined two or three examinations of ultrasound + CT+ T-tube cholangiography and single imaging examination (x2=40.83,P<0.05).The further analysis showed a statistically significant difference among the single imaging examination (x2=7.70,P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference among the combined two of imaging examinations (x2=2.10,P>0.05).There were statistically significant differences in the combined three examinations of ultrasound +CT+T-tube cholangiography and ultrasound and T-tube cholangiography examination respectively (x2=16.23,21.62,P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the combined three of imaging examinations and CT examination and combination of CT+T-tube cholangiography respectively (P> 0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the combined three of imaging examinations and combination of ultrasound+CT examinations and combination of ultrasound+T-tube cholangiography (x2=0.33,1.71,P>0.05).Seventy-one patients without residual bile duct stone by preoperative imaging examination were detected residual bile duct stones by intraoperative choledochoscopy,and residual bile duct stones of 36,31 and 4 patients are respectively distributed around the distal common bile duct,small intrahepatic bile duct,left and right hepatic ducts,common hepatic duct and remaining common bile duct.(2) Stone extraction situations of patients with hepatolithiasis:of 618 patients,cases with 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 and 10 times of residual bile duct stones clearance were respectively 392,116,48,39,9,6,3,2,2 and 1.Residual bile duct stones clearance frequency of patients was an average of 1.73 times.There were 63.43%(392/618) and 96.28%(595/618) of patients had stone clearance with once and ≤ 4 times of stone extraction,respectively.Conclusion The negative results of preoperative imaging examinations cannot be as standards of bile duct stone clearance before choledochoscopy,and the best choice is to detect whether there are residual bile duct stones and remove the stones combined with choledochoscopy.

4.
Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery ; (12): 610-614, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-810110

ABSTRACT

Objective@#To explore the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck Castleman′s disease (CD), and to improve the understanding of the disease.@*Methods@#The clinical data of 41 patients with head and neck CD treated from January 2007 to July 2017 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups: localized CD (LCD, n=27) and multicentric CD (MCD, n=14). The clinical manifestations, laboratory examinations, operations, pathological findings and follow-up data were analyzed.@*Results@#LCD was characterized by asymptomatic enlargement of the single lymph node with mild clinical symptoms. The main pathological type was hyaline vascular type, which can be cured by surgical treatment. MCD accompanied by fever 9 cases(64.3%), anemia 8 cases (57.1%), splenomegaly 7 cases (50.0%), respiratory symptoms 6 cases (42.9%), with multiple enlarged superficial and deep lymph nodes with pain, pleural effusion, and edema of lower extremity, C-reaction protein increased in 8 cases (57.1%), hypoproteinemia 8 cases(57.1%), globulin increased 7 cases (50.0%) and neutropenia 6 cases(42.9%). The main pathological type was plasma cell type in 7 cases (50.0%), and also there were 4 cases of hyaline vascular type and 2 cases of mixed type. Chemotherapy with or without rituximab was the main treatment. Most patients received complete or partial remission except for 2 patients who died of lung infection due to chemotherapy.@*Conclusions@#The diagnosis of head and neck CD depends on pathological examination. LCD shows mild symptoms and good prognosis after surgery. However, clinical manifestations of MCD are complex, with relatively poor prognosis after comprehensive treatment.

5.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery ; (12): 431-434, 2013.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-435918

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the risk factors for locally recurrent rectal cancer after radical resection.Methods The clinical data of 50 locally recurrent rectal cancer patients (recurrent group) and 100 matched controls (control group) who received radical resection at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen university from January 2000 to March 2009 were retrospectively analyzed.Factors including tumor location,postoperative chemotherapy,tumor differentiation,vascular or neural invasion,T stage,tumor diameter,number of lymph nodes dissected and number of positive lymph nodes of the 2 groups were analysed by univariate analysis,and factors correlated with tumor recurrence were screened out.All data were analyzed using the chi-square test,t test,Wilcoxon test or Logistic regression analysis.Results All the patients were followed up till January 2013,and the median time of follow-up was 52 months.Twenty-two patients in the recurrent group and 32 patients in the control group died during the follow-up.The results of univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in tumor location and T stage between the 2 groups (x2 =6.407,9.652,P < 0.05).There were no significant differences in postoperative chemotherapy,tumor differentiation,vascular and neural invasion,tumor diameter,number of lymph nodes dissected and number of positive lymph nodes between the 2 groups (x2 =1.349,0.342,0.656,Z =7142.5,8214.5,7241.5,P > 0.05).The results of multivariate analysis showed that tumor location and T stage were the factors correlated with the tumor recurrence after radical resection (Wald =3.954,5.615,P < 0.05).Compared with upper rectal cancer,the local recurrence rate was not significantly different in the middle rectal cancer (OR =1.893,P > 0.05),whereas the lower rectal cancer had a higher local recurrence rate (OR =3.201,P <0.05).Compared with patients in T2 stage,the local recurrence rate was not significantly different in patients in T3 stage (OR =4.913,P >0.05),while patients in T4 stage had a higher local recurrence rate (OR =16.103,P < 0.05).Conclusion Locally recurrent rectal cancer is closely related to tumor location and T stage,which indicates that factors reflecting the extent of surgical resection (such as circumferential margin) are of great importance in assessing the prognosis and making subsequent treatment schedule.

6.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery ; (12): 430-435, 2011.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-421553

ABSTRACT

Objective To analyze the clinicopathological factors on the prognosis and investigate the necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage Ⅱ colorectal cancer.Methods The clinical data of 255 patients with stage Ⅱ colorectal cancer who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University from January 2000 to December 2005 were collected.The survival curve was drawn by Kaplan-Meier method,and the survival rate of the patients were analyzed by Log-rank test.Factors influencing the survival were analyzed by Cox regression model.Results All patients were followed up till April 23,2010,and the mean time of follow-up was (63 ± 22)months.The median survival time was 63 months.The 5-year and tumor-free survival rates were 85.3% and 83.7%,respectively.The 5-year overall and tumor-free survival rates of patients without preoperative bowel obstruction or perforation were 86.9% and 85.6%,which were sigaificantly higher than 72.7%and 68.4% of patients with preoperative bowel obstruction or perforation(x2 =4.546,4.573,P < 0.05 ).The 5-year overall and tumor-free survival rates of patients with negative resection margin were 85.5% and 83.9%,which were significantly higher than 75.0% and 75.0% of patients with positive resection margin(x2 =7.020,6.009,P < 0.05 ).The result of multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative bowel obstruction or perforation were the independent risk factors for patients with stage Ⅱ colorectal cancer(Wald =4.477,relative risk =2.371,95 % confidence interval:1.066-5.275,P < 0.05 ).The 5-year overall and tumor-free survival rates were 87.3% and 86.0% for patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy,and were 82.2% and 80.3% for patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (P > 0.05 ).Conclusions Preoperative bowel obstruction or perforation are independent risk factors for the survival of patients with stage Ⅱ colorectal cancer.Adjuvant chemotherapy could not improve the prognosis of patients with stage Ⅱ colorectal cancer.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL